Approximate Maximum kcut
This algorithm is in the alpha tier. For more information on algorithm tiers, see Graph algorithms.
1. Introduction
A kcut of a graph is an assignment of its nodes into k disjoint communities.
So for example a 2cut of a graph with nodes a,b,c,d
could be the communities {a,b,c}
and {d}
.
A Maximum kcut is a kcut such that the total weight of relationships between nodes from different communities in the kcut is maximized.
That is, a kcut that maximizes the sum of weights of relationships whose source and target nodes are assigned to different communities in the kcut.
Suppose in the simple a,b,c,d
node set example above we only had one relationship b → c
, and it was of weight 1.0
.
The 2cut we outlined above would then not be a maximum 2cut (with a cut cost of 0.0
), whereas for example the 2cut with communities {a,b}
and {c,d}
would be one (with a cut cost of 1.0
).
Maximum kcut is the same as Maximum Cut when 
This algorithm is in the alpha tier. For more information on algorithm tiers, see Graph algorithms.
1.1. Applications
Finding the maximum kcut for a graph has several known applications, for example it is used to:

analyze protein interaction

design circuit (VLSI) layouts

solve wireless communication problems

analyze cryptocurrency transaction patterns

design computer networks
1.2. Approximation
In practice, finding the best cut is not feasible for larger graphs and only an approximation can be computed in reasonable time.
The approximate heuristic algorithm implemented in GDS is a parallelized GRASP style algorithm optionally enhanced (via config) with variable neighborhood search (VNS).
For detailed information about a serial version of the algorithm, with a slightly different construction phase, when k = 2
see GRASP+VNR
in the paper:
To see how the algorithm above performs in terms of solution quality compared to other algorithms when k = 2
see FES02GV
in the paper:
By the stochastic nature of the algorithm, the results it yields will not be deterministic unless running singlethreaded ( 
2. Tuning the algorithm parameters
There are two important algorithm specific parameters which lets you trade solution quality for shorter runtime.
2.1. Iterations
GRASP style algorithms are iterative by nature. Every iteration they run the same welldefined steps to derive a solution, but each time with a different random seed yielding solutions that (highly likely) are different too. In the end the highest scoring solution is picked as the winner.
2.2. VNS max neighborhood order
Variable neighborhood search (VNS) works by slightly perturbing a locally optimal solution derived from the previous steps in an iteration of the algorithm, followed by locally optimizing this perturbed solution. Perturb in this case means to randomly move some nodes from their current (locally optimal) community to another community.
VNS will in turn move 1,2,…,vnsMaxNeighborhoodOrder
random nodes and using each of the resulting solutions try to find a new locally optimal solution that’s better.
This means that although potentially better solutions can be derived using VNS it will take more time, and additionally some more memory will be needed to temporarily store the perturbed solutions.
By default, VNS is not used (vnsMaxNeighborhoodOrder = 0
).
To use it, experimenting with a maximum order equal to 20
is a good place to start.
3. Syntax
This section covers the syntax used to execute the Approximate Maximum kcut algorithm in each of its execution modes. We are describing the named graph variant of the syntax. To learn more about general syntax variants, see Syntax overview.
CALL gds.alpha.maxkcut.stream(
graphName: String,
configuration: Map
) YIELD
nodeId: Integer,
communityId: Integer
Name  Type  Default  Optional  Description 

graphName 
String 

no 
The name of a graph stored in the catalog. 
configuration 
Map 

yes 
Configuration for algorithmspecifics and/or graph filtering. 
Name  Type  Default  Optional  Description 

List of String 

yes 
Filter the named graph using the given node labels. 

List of String 

yes 
Filter the named graph using the given relationship types. 

Integer 

yes 
The number of concurrent threads used for running the algorithm. 

String 

yes 
An ID that can be provided to more easily track the algorithm’s progress. 

k 
Integer 

yes 
The number of disjoint communities the nodes will be divided into. 
Integer 

yes 
The number of iterations the algorithm will run before returning the best solution among all the iterations. 

Integer 

yes 
The maximum number of nodes VNS will swap when perturbing solutions. 

randomSeed 
Integer 

yes 
A random seed which is used for all randomness in the computation. Requires 
String 

yes 
If set, the values stored at the given property are used as relationship weights during the computation. If not set, the graph is considered unweighted. 
Name  Type  Description 

nodeId 
Integer 
Node ID. 
communityId 
Integer 
Community ID. 
CALL gds.alpha.maxkcut.mutate(
graphName: String,
configuration: Map
) YIELD
cutCost: Float,
preProcessingMillis: Integer,
computeMillis: Integer,
postProcessingMillis: Integer,
mutateMillis: Integer,
nodePropertiesWritten: Integer,
configuration: Map
Name  Type  Default  Optional  Description 

graphName 
String 

no 
The name of a graph stored in the catalog. 
configuration 
Map 

yes 
Configuration for algorithmspecifics and/or graph filtering. 
Name  Type  Default  Optional  Description 

mutateProperty 
String 

no 
The node property in the GDS graph to which the approximate maximum kcut is written. 
List of String 

yes 
Filter the named graph using the given node labels. 

List of String 

yes 
Filter the named graph using the given relationship types. 

Integer 

yes 
The number of concurrent threads used for running the algorithm. 

String 

yes 
An ID that can be provided to more easily track the algorithm’s progress. 

k 
Integer 

yes 
The number of disjoint communities the nodes will be divided into. 
Integer 

yes 
The number of iterations the algorithm will run before returning the best solution among all the iterations. 

Integer 

yes 
The maximum number of nodes VNS will swap when perturbing solutions. 

randomSeed 
Integer 

yes 
A random seed which is used for all randomness in the computation. Requires 
String 

yes 
If set, the values stored at the given property are used as relationship weights during the computation. If not set, the graph is considered unweighted. 
Name  Type  Description 

cutCost 
Float 
Sum of weights of all relationships connecting nodes from different communities. 
preProcessingMillis 
Integer 
Milliseconds for preprocessing the data. 
computeMillis 
Integer 
Milliseconds for running the algorithm. 
postProcessingMillis 
Integer 
Milliseconds for computing the statistics. 
mutateMillis 
Integer 
Milliseconds for adding properties to the projected graph. 
nodePropertiesWritten 
Integer 
Number of properties added to the projected graph. 
configuration 
Map 
Configuration used for running the algorithm. 
4. Examples
In this section we will show examples of running the Approximate Maximum kcut algorithm on a concrete graph. The intention is to illustrate what the results look like and to provide a guide in how to make use of the algorithm in a real setting. We will do this on a small Bitcoin transactions graph of a handful nodes connected in a particular pattern. The example graph looks like this:
CREATE
(alice:Person {name: 'Alice'}),
(bridget:Person {name: 'Bridget'}),
(charles:Person {name: 'Charles'}),
(doug:Person {name: 'Doug'}),
(eric:Person {name: 'Eric'}),
(fiona:Person {name: 'Fiona'}),
(george:Person {name: 'George'}),
(alice)[:TRANSACTION {value: 81.0}]>(bridget),
(alice)[:TRANSACTION {value: 7.0}]>(doug),
(bridget)[:TRANSACTION {value: 1.0}]>(doug),
(bridget)[:TRANSACTION {value: 1.0}]>(eric),
(bridget)[:TRANSACTION {value: 1.0}]>(fiona),
(bridget)[:TRANSACTION {value: 1.0}]>(george),
(charles)[:TRANSACTION {value: 45.0}]>(bridget),
(charles)[:TRANSACTION {value: 3.0}]>(eric),
(doug)[:TRANSACTION {value: 3.0}]>(charles),
(doug)[:TRANSACTION {value: 1.0}]>(bridget),
(eric)[:TRANSACTION {value: 1.0}]>(bridget),
(fiona)[:TRANSACTION {value: 3.0}]>(alice),
(fiona)[:TRANSACTION {value: 1.0}]>(bridget),
(george)[:TRANSACTION {value: 1.0}]>(bridget),
(george)[:TRANSACTION {value: 4.0}]>(charles)
With the graph in Neo4j we can now project it into the graph catalog to prepare it for algorithm execution.
We do this using a native projection targeting the Person
nodes and the TRANSACTION
relationships.
CALL gds.graph.project(
'myGraph',
'Person',
{
TRANSACTION: {
properties: ['value']
}
}
)
4.1. Memory Estimation
First off, we will estimate the cost of running the algorithm using the estimate
procedure.
This can be done with any execution mode.
We will use the mutate
mode in this example.
Estimating the algorithm is useful to understand the memory impact that running the algorithm on your graph will have.
When you later actually run the algorithm in one of the execution modes the system will perform an estimation.
If the estimation shows that there is a very high probability of the execution going over its memory limitations, the execution is prohibited.
To read more about this, see Automatic estimation and execution blocking.
For more details on estimate
in general, see Memory Estimation.
CALL gds.alpha.maxkcut.mutate.estimate('myGraph', {mutateProperty: 'community'})
YIELD nodeCount, relationshipCount, bytesMin, bytesMax, requiredMemory
nodeCount  relationshipCount  bytesMin  bytesMax  requiredMemory 

7 
15 
488 
488 
"488 Bytes" 
4.2. Mutate
The mutate
execution mode extends the stats
mode with an important side effect: updating the named graph with a new node property containing the approximate maximum kcut for that node.
The name of the new property is specified using the mandatory configuration parameter mutateProperty
.
The result is a single summary row, similar to stats
, but with some additional metrics.
The mutate
mode is especially useful when multiple algorithms are used in conjunction.
For more details on the mutate
mode in general, see Mutate.
mutate
mode:CALL gds.alpha.maxkcut.mutate('myGraph', {mutateProperty: 'community'})
YIELD cutCost, nodePropertiesWritten
cutCost  nodePropertiesWritten 

13.0 
7 
We can see that when relationship weight is not taken into account we derive a cut into two (since we didn’t override the default k = 2
) communities of cost 13.0
.
The total cost is represented by the cutCost
column here.
This is the value we want to be as high as possible.
Additionally, the graph 'myGraph' now has a node property community
which stores the community to which each node belongs.
To inspect which community each node belongs to we can stream node properties.
CALL gds.graph.streamNodeProperty('myGraph', 'community')
YIELD nodeId, propertyValue
RETURN gds.util.asNode(nodeId).name as name, propertyValue AS community
name  community 

"Alice" 
0 
"Bridget" 
0 
"Charles" 
0 
"Doug" 
1 
"Eric" 
1 
"Fiona" 
1 
"George" 
1 
Looking at our graph topology we can see that there are no relationships between the nodes of community 1
, and two relationships between the nodes of community 0
, namely Alice → Bridget
and Charles → Bridget
.
However, since there are a total of eight relationships between Bridget
and nodes of community 1
, and our graph is unweighted assigning Bridget
to community 1
would not yield a cut of a higher total weight.
Thus, since the number of relationships connecting nodes of different communities greatly outnumber the number of relationships connecting nodes of the same community it seems like a good solution.
In fact, this is the maximum 2cut for this graph.
Because of the inherent randomness in the Approximate Maximum kCut algorithm (unless having 
4.3. Mutate with relationship weights
In this example we will have a look at how adding relationship weight can affect our solution.
mutate
mode, diving our nodes into two communities once again:CALL gds.alpha.maxkcut.mutate(
'myGraph',
{
relationshipWeightProperty: 'value',
mutateProperty: 'weightedCommunity'
}
)
YIELD cutCost, nodePropertiesWritten
cutCost  nodePropertiesWritten 

146.0 
7 
Since the value
properties on our TRANSACTION
relationships were all at least 1.0
and several of a larger value it’s not surprising that we obtain a cut with a larger cost in the weighted case.
Let us now stream node properties to once again inspect the node community distribution.
CALL gds.graph.streamNodeProperty('myGraph', 'weightedCommunity')
YIELD nodeId, propertyValue
RETURN gds.util.asNode(nodeId).name as name, propertyValue AS weightedCommunity
name  weightedCommunity 

"Alice" 
0 
"Bridget" 
1 
"Charles" 
0 
"Doug" 
1 
"Eric" 
1 
"Fiona" 
1 
"George" 
1 
Comparing this result with that of unweighted case we can see that Bridget
has moved to another community but the output is otherwise the same.
Indeed, this makes sense by looking at our graph.
Bridget
is connected to nodes of community 1
by eight relationships, but these relationships all have weight 1.0
.
And although Bridget
is only connected to two community 0
nodes, these relationships are of weight 81.0
and 45.0
.
Moving Bridget
back to community 0
would lower the total cut cost of 81.0 + 45.0  8 * 1.0 = 118.0
.
Hence, it does make sense that Bridget
is now in community 1
.
In fact, this is the maximum 2cut in the weighted case.
Because of the inherent randomness in the Approximate Maximum kCut algorithm (unless having 
4.4. Stream
In the stream
execution mode, the algorithm returns the approximate maximum kcut for each node.
This allows us to inspect the results directly or postprocess them in Cypher without any side effects.
For more details on the stream
mode in general, see Stream.
stream
mode using default configuration parameters:CALL gds.alpha.maxkcut.stream('myGraph')
YIELD nodeId, communityId
RETURN gds.util.asNode(nodeId).name AS name, communityId
name  communityId 

"Alice" 
0 
"Bridget" 
0 
"Charles" 
0 
"Doug" 
1 
"Eric" 
1 
"Fiona" 
1 
"George" 
1 
We can see that the result is what we expect, namely the same as in the mutate unweighted example.
Because of the inherent randomness in the Approximate Maximum kCut algorithm (unless having 
Was this page helpful?