Fraudsters have been quick to adapt to this trend, and to devise clever ways to defraud online payment systems. While this type of activity can and does involve criminal fraud rings, a well-educated fraudster can create a very large number of synthetic identities on his or her own and use these to carry on sizeable schemes.
Fortunately, graph database technology is able to detect the patterns that arise around these e-commerce fraud scenarios and put an end to them in real time – before a fraudster can inflict significant damage.
In this series on fraud detection, we’re going to take a closer look at how graph databases help detect and mitigate three types of fraud:
A Typical E-commerce Fraud Scenario
Consider an online transaction with the following identifiers:
- User ID
- IP address
- Geo location
- A tracking cookie
- Credit card number
However, as soon as the relationships begin to exceed a reasonable number, e-commerce fraud is often at play. For example: A large numbers of users may have transactions originating from the same IP, large numbers of shipments to different addresses may use the same credit card, or a large numbers of credit cards may all use the same address.
In each of these scenarios, it is the pattern inside the graph – discovered by walking the relationships between disparate pieces of information – that can serve as strong indicating signals of an e-commerce fraud event.
The more interconnections exist amongst identifiers, the greater the cause for concern. Large and tightly-knit graphs are very strong indicators that fraud is taking place.
How Graph Databases Help with E-commerce Fraud Detection
As in the first-party bank fraud and insurance fraud examples from previous weeks, graph databases are designed to carry out pattern discovery in real time across precisely these kinds of datasets.
By putting checks into place and associating them with the appropriate event triggers, such schemes can be uncovered before they are able to inflict significant damage. Triggers can include events such as login, placing an order or registering a new credit card.
The graph below shows a series of transactions from different IP addresses. IPx represents distinct IP address, CCx distinct Credit Card number, IDx represents the UserID used to carry out the online transaction and CKx refers to a specific cookie stored in the system.
In this example, there is a likely e-commerce fraud event occurring from IP1, which has carried out multiple transactions using five credit cards, one of which (CC1) is used by multiple IDs, where two cookies (CK1 and CK2) each share two IDs.
Graph databases are the ideal enabler for efficient and manageable fraud detection solutions. From fraud rings and collusive groups, to educated criminals operating on their own, graph databases uncover a variety of important e-commerce fraud patterns – and all in real time.
Want to learn more about how graph databases improve fraud detection? Download this white paper, Fraud Detection: Discovering Connections with Graph Databases.
Catch up with the rest of the fraud detection series:
About the Author
Gorka Sadowski & Philip Rathle, Akalak & Neo Technology
Gorka Sadowski is the founder and CEO of Akalak, whose mission is to provide technology and cybersecurity solutions and services for a better world. Akalak has helped many clients in the US and Europe with their offerings and security posture.
Philip Rathle is the VP of Products at Neo Technology. He has a passion for building great products that help users solve tomorrow’s challenges. He spent the first decade of his career building information solutions for some of the world’s largest companies: first with Accenture, then with Tanning Technology, one of the world’s top database consultancies of the time, as a solution architect focusing on data warehousing and BI strategy.
From the CEO
Have a Graph Question?
Reach out and connect with the Neo4j staff.Stackoverflow
Share your Graph Story?
Email us: email@example.com